I chose this article because I happen to be a person who would like to know what it is exactly that Im eating.
Whole Foods announced that they would be the first retailer in the country to label all goods containing genetically modified organisms in its 339 stores by 2018. Whole Foods co-chief want its customers to know what's in the food their buying and putting into their body. While I like this idea, I think their too expensive, they need to not only have honest labeling but be more affordable. People who cant afford expensive healthy food deserve honest labeling too. I agree that honest labeling should not be mandatory as it will only mislead consumers over ingredients that have been deemed safe.
While I may be against GMO labeling, here's a list of a few company's that are all for GMO labeling:
People have a right to choose wether they want to know what their eating or not. I choose not to know because I feel, i've been eating the same stuff since I was born. I don't want to be confused by all these labels. About 70 to 80 percent of processed foods sold in the United States are made with genetically engineered ingredients, including corn, soybeans, sugar beets and cotton oil. Many of these crops have been genetically altered in the laboratory to make them more resistant to pests and invasive weeds, reducing the need for chemical pesticides and making the crops better suited to survive periods of bad weather. Genetically modified crops also significantly increase per-acre yields, reducing the demand for farmland.
The Chron quotes UCLA molecular biologist Bob Goldberg, who told the paper, "Bioengineered crops are the safest crops in the world. We've been testing them for 40 years. They're like the Model T Ford. There is not one credible scientist working on this that would call it unsafe."
We have been eating GMO's for decades, why now is it such a big deal?
A website: (http://www.naturalnews.com/GMO.html) Is all for GMO labeling and gives reasons why its a good thing, such as:
GMOs are often genetically created artificially to tolerate herbicides, made by Monsanto and others, that kill weeds. The herbicides contain glyphosates. Monsanto's Roundup weed killer is meant for Roundup Ready GMO crop seeds. It's an extremely toxic glyphosate agent.
Glyphosates greatly harm grazing animals and pollute the wells and groundwater of farm areas where they're used.
They create sterility and birth defects among animals and humans. Most of the honey bee die-off, or colony collapse, is attributed to glyphosates. If enough pollinating bees disappear, our food chain is endangered further.
Glophosate's chelating capabilities remove minerals from the soil where they're sprayed. So crops get increasingly worse while increasingly abundant Roundup resistant weeds, or super weeds, force farmers to add more toxic materials to Roundup.
It's a vicious cycle for farmers who, conned by greater production promises, unwittingly signed on to Monsanto Roundup Ready GMO binding seed contracts. Monsanto uses patent laws to litigate against farmers whose non-GMO fields are contaminated by GMO fields, forcing smaller farms out of business.
Most farmers fold because they cannot afford the litigation. American farmers are attempting to organize against mostly Monsanto's GMOs. European farmers have managed to resist thus far.
Here's why I believe they are wrong: The public is divided among individuals who believe that GMOs are bad, others who think they are valuable, and many who are basically indifferent. The last group may not see the damage of requiring labeling of GMOs since they do not see the big loss. However, labels make a difference. A labeling requirement creates a stigma effect that will reduce the demand for GM products and may reduce investment in new GM traits. The net effect will be to slow the development of agricultural biotechnology, and this in turn may negatively affect health, the economy, and the environment. It is actually counter-productive to the many environmental and social goals that we cherish. Therefore, labeling of GMOs will be a step in the wrong direction.